Tuesday, 1 November 2011

What Can A Simple Pill Do To The Human Body?

What Can A Simple Pill Do To The Human Body?

Viagra exploded onto the erectile dysfunction scene many years ago. It has since been the leader in erectile dysfunction remedies, along with its close counterpart viagra cialis online pharmacy pharmacy. But many prescription drugs are particularly harmful to the human body; where does Viagra and Cialis fit?

The Good: How Viagra Works for Your Body

The problem with erectile dysfunction is simple: there is not enough blood flow to the penis. We can counteract this effect by simply increasing the blood flow- usually with a muscle relaxer. But most common muscle relaxers will indeed relax the entire body- including the penis.

What is needed, specifically, is drugs that can relax the right muscles to stimulate blood flow to the penis- all while keep from relaxing the penis completely. Originally the cure came in the form of an injection- but today we have a pill form known as Viagra.

Getting to the Specifics: What Does Viagra Do?

To actually open up blood flow to the penis for an erection, Viagra decreases the levels of phosphodiesterase, or PDE. This enzyme decomposes a necessary chemical, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). cGMP is necessary to obtain an erection, so therefore stopping the PDE from decomposing this chemical will result in a healthy erection.

Generally, the more cGMP that is built up means the greater the blood flow that is present. This will result in a much healthier erection, even when men suffer from conditions such as erectile dysfunction.

The Side Effects of Viagra

One interesting side effect (that is far from dangerous) is that Viagra will give some users a bluish-tinted perspective. This actually means that pilots are forbidden to take Viagra 12 hours before flying. Other than pilots, everyone else can sit back and enjoy the virtual blue sunglasses.

Viagra does have more serious side effects, however. Viagra is a prescription drug (as compared to over the counter) mainly because a doctor needs to check one's medical history before giving the green light to take the drug. Serious altercations such as heart attacks can result from taking Viagra, so a doctor visit is mandatory before taking Viagra.

Other more common side effects include headaches and related minor annoyances. Aside from these listed side effects, Viagra is actually a very safe drug to use- as compared to other alternatives.

Alternatives to Viagra: Improving on the Blueprint

Drugs such as Cialis work very similarly to Viagra. Whereas Viagra blocks one certain enzyme in the human body, drugs such as Cialis block another, and thus, different side effects result.

The main difference between Cialis-like drugs is that they won't cause color vision changes within users. Cialis users are also able to get an erection for around 18 hours in a day- from what Cialis claims. The only downfall to Cialis is that in 5% of men, muscle ache results from taking the drug.

Cialis is, likewise, generally preferred among pilots. It is also preferred when a male desires to obtain an erection at any point in the day- not just at specific times. However, both drugs have been long proven to give men their life back when concerning erectile dysfunction. Keep in mind that a doctor visit will be necessary to help rule out possible critical side effects.

Once the green light is given, the road to sexual satisfaction will once again be paved in gold.

Saturday, 29 October 2011

McCain gets awkward over Viagra and Birth Control



he voted to have health insurance companies cover online pharmacy viagra, but not birth control. Now he can't give an answer as to whether he thinks that's fair.

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

2. Healthcare needs to be aimed at Health





We have a medical system that has spent trillions of dollars, massive man hours all aimed at eliminating disease. We have "wars" on cancer, diabetes, heart disease but still these chronic conditions persit. Too often we are lead to believe that health is merely the absence of disease. The concept of removing disease to create health sounds nice in theroy but thats where it ends. this has been a over eighty year experiement that has not benefit the overall health of a person. but removing disease does not always mean that you have created health. One example is cancer, I have so many patients that did massive amount of chemotherapy and radiation that damaged their health and immune system leaving them even more susceptible to have another cancer arise several years later. No I am not saying that those treatments are not valuable in some situation I am saying that we need to focus on disease prevention through health enhancement and also do treatments that assist in the bodies healing. Health is created by health, happiness is created by happiness. It is like the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff story,



How many healthy sick people do you know? When you see someone taking medications do you typically think of them as a healthy person? Is a healthy person someone that needs more and more medications and surgeries as they age or less to no medications? Why is it that every time we use the word "healthcare", it really means "disease care" or "disease management". How much health-care is really in our current health care model? Why are we only using the 'bandaid to body-parts” approach.



We currently have no health system that merges the disease based model of lowering down symptoms (medications and surgeries), with a health enhancement model. We have a system that treats “DISEASE” without promoting "HEALTH". Most conventional medical doctors and the current medical system address a person when their health has declined enough to create a definable disease. It is then at the “diseased state” that the system can justify spending funds on the person. In other words, “you have to be sick to get a test or treatment”.





Contributing factors like; the aging population with poor lifestyle choices, decreased fitness and increased obesity has created an expensive and overburdened “disease care” system and not a proactive less expensive “healthcare” system. Unfortunately what this translates into for a person, is that you have to be noticeably “sick” or “diseased” (by the systems approved testing) to qualify for treatment. This has caused the public to seek out more alternatives.





Patients constantly say statements like; my purchase cialis does not do any prevention and does not have the time to talk about more than one problem a visit. My doctors only does tests to see if I am sick, they do not do tests to see how healthy I am. Why do I have to be sick to get a test? Why doesn’t my medical cialis teach me about diet, fitness, lifestyle and stress reduction? Why does my medical doctor only treat symptoms? Why does my medical doctor always give me a new drug prescription for every problem?





Believe it or not, it’s hard to be a medical doctor; your medical doctor is doing the best job that they can. The problem lies in how they have been trained to look at a patient. It’s that old saying “if all you have is a hammer than everyone is a nail”. Most of the population would agree that medical doctors are essential and have a definite place in a medical system; they excel in “crisis management”, for instance, broken legs, accidents, heart attacks, gun shots, etc. Most conventional medical doctors are highly trained in disease management via decreasing the physical signs and symptoms of disease using treatments that include drugs and surgery. However most of the population is not aware that the treatments necessary to save a life in “crisis” are totally different than those needed to prevent and reverse chronic disease which is ninety percent of all disease. When I was doing a minor surgery shift in Portland, I would stand back in admiration of how amazing the medical doctor was in saving a person life suffering from a heart attack. I soon realized after several shifts that sometimes the same person had to be saved over and over and that in order to really make a difference, how doctors see their patient had to change.







I was able to stand back and see the best of both worlds; I realized that they must be merged. If you have a heart attack you definitely want to see a crisis doctor specialized in disease, however if you want to prevent a heart attack you must seek out a doctor trained in health, and both of these must overlap and be supported. One reality for patients is that chronic disease is increasing, and that the system of treating these chronic diseases with drugs and surgery instead of enhancing health (called prevention) maybe life saving in the short term but it is very be ineffective and extremely costly in both money and quality of life in the long term. Most of the population unfortunately is not fully informed of the current deficiencies in the medical system and even more so are not encouraged to explore viable alternatives (Chiropractic, Naturopathic, Anti-aging, Osteopathic, Acupuncture, Nutritional, Lifestyle and Emotional counseling) Because of this, patients tend to go to what they know and what is available. They seek out alternative or non-conventional medical information from their conventional medical doctor or pharmacist with the assumption that they will also be experts in this field and in realty they are not (image vs. reality). The obvious problem is that currently most medical doctors have only minimal or no training in prevention, nutrition, vitamins, hormones, anti-aging, stress coping and happiness enhancement and therefore leaving the patient without options. This hunger for viable preventable options is what has fueled the rapid growth of patients seeking viable options that carry less side effects, improve the quality and quantity of life and give more power of choice to the patient.